Hallmarks of Science Missing from North American Wildlife Management

Authors

Kyle A. Artelle, Simon Fraser UniversityFollow
John D. Reynolds, Simon Fraser University
Adrian Treves, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Jessica C. Walsh, Simon Fraser University
Paul C. Paquet, University of VictoriaFollow
Chris T. Darimont, University of VictoriaFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

3-2-2018

Abstract

Resource management agencies commonly defend controversial policy by claiming adherence to science-based approaches. For example, proponents and practitioners of the “North American Model of Wildlife Conservation,” which guides hunting policy across much of the United States and Canada, assert that science plays a central role in shaping policy. However, what that means is rarely defined. We propose a framework that identifies four fundamental hallmarks of science relevant to natural resource management (measurable objectives, evidence, transparency, and independent review) and test for their presence in hunt management plans created by 62 U.S. state and Canadian provincial and territorial agencies across 667 management systems (species-jurisdictions). We found that most (60%) systems contained fewer than half of the indicator criteria assessed, with more criteria detected in systems that were peer-reviewed, that pertained to “big game,” and in jurisdictions at increasing latitudes. These results raise doubt about the purported scientific basis of hunt management across the United States and Canada. Our framework provides guidance for adopting a science-based approach to safeguard not only wildlife but also agencies from potential social, legal, and political conflict.

Comments

Open Access Article

Recommended Citation

Artelle, K. A., Reynolds, J. D., Treves, A., Walsh, J. C., Paquet, P. C., & Darimont, C. T. (2018). Hallmarks of science missing from North American wildlife management. Science advances, 4(3), eaao0167.